Call NowSchedule Now
SSEI
Home
Mock TestsFree Resources
The Finance Lab
+91 75950 53300
info@ssei.co.in
SSEI
Sanjay Saraf
+91 75950 53300
info@ssei.co.in
FLAT 10% OFF SITEWIDEApply SSEILAUNCH10 at checkout
VIEWSanjay Saraf Sir is back to teach FRM after 9 years|VIEWRedefine Your Career With Our Upcoming LIVE Events Happening This Month|VIEWSanjay Saraf Sir featured in The Hindu on the future of commerce education|VIEWNext ACCA Batch Starts 28th August|VIEWLearn AI-enabled Financial Modelling with SSEI
VIEWSanjay Saraf Sir is back to teach FRM after 9 years|VIEWRedefine Your Career With Our Upcoming LIVE Events Happening This Month|VIEWSanjay Saraf Sir featured in The Hindu on the future of commerce education|VIEWNext ACCA Batch Starts 28th August|VIEWLearn AI-enabled Financial Modelling with SSEI
Home›Blogs›Decoding the AI Stack - Compute, Models and who captures the Value
General

Decoding the AI Stack - Compute, Models and who captures the Value

SA
Sanjay Saraf
📅 2 August 2026⏱ 5 min read
Share:LinkedInTwitterEmail

Related Posts

The AI Boom: Revolution or Capital Destruction?

The AI Boom: Revolution or Capital Destruction?

6 min read

You Would Never Invest Money the Way You Invest Your Career

You Would Never Invest Money the Way You Invest Your Career

5 min read

Why CFA and CA Qualified Professionals Still Struggle With Practical Finance Work

Why CFA and CA Qualified Professionals Still Struggle With Practical Finance Work

5 min read

##aistack #ai #hyperscaler #spread #investments

If you are trying to understand where the real investment opportunity in AI lies, start with one question: will the companies spending the most on AI necessarily capture the most value from it?

Not necessarily.

Hyperscalers are committing enormous amounts of capital to chips, power and data-centre infrastructure. At the same time, China is demonstrating that competitive AI capabilities may also emerge through a more capital-efficient route. This creates an important distinction between where capital is being deployed and where pricing power may eventually remain.

To understand that distinction, we first need to look at how the AI stack is structured.

The Stack: Factories Below, Products Above

At its simplest, the AI industry can be understood in two layers:

●       Infrastructure layer: Power, chips, servers and data centres that provide the computing capacity AI systems need.

●       Application layer: Models, copilots and software products that customers and businesses actually use.

Most hyperscaler capex is flowing into the infrastructure layer, on the assumption that companies controlling more compute today will be better positioned to dominate the models and applications built on top of it tomorrow. But owning the factory does not automatically mean capturing the greatest share of value from the products running on it. That is where the investment debate begins.

The Funding Problem Hiding in Plain Sight

The scale of AI investment is widely discussed. What receives less attention is how these investments may eventually be funded. Google, Meta, Amazon and other hyperscalers are increasing their spending as demand for computing capacity continues to grow.

For some, these investments may eventually exceed what operating cash flows can comfortably support, increasing their reliance on external funding. The real question is not how much they are spending, but whether the infrastructure being built can generate returns high enough to justify both the capital committed and the cost of funding it. This is where credit markets begin to offer an important second opinion.

What Credit Spreads Are Signaling

Equity markets may remain optimistic about AI-led growth, but credit markets are beginning to show greater caution. Wider bond spreads and higher CDS (credit default swaps) premiums suggest that lenders are paying closer attention to rising AI spending, potential borrowing needs and the time these investments may take to generate returns.

SA
Sanjay Saraf

Sanjay Saraf Sir is a renowned finance educator known for making finance feel practical, intuitive, and connected to the real world.

View All Articles

Found this useful? Share it:

Share:LinkedInTwitterEmail

Related Posts

The AI Boom: Revolution or Capital Destruction?

The AI Boom: Revolution or Capital Destruction?

6 min read

You Would Never Invest Money the Way You Invest Your Career

You Would Never Invest Money the Way You Invest Your Career

5 min read

Why CFA and CA Qualified Professionals Still Struggle With Practical Finance Work

Why CFA and CA Qualified Professionals Still Struggle With Practical Finance Work

5 min read

📧 Weekly Finance Insights

Study tips, exam updates, and career advice - every week.

Ready to Start?

Join thousands of SSEI students who cleared their exam on the first attempt.

Explore Courses
SSEI

India's Leading Finance Prep Provider

Sanjay Saraf Educational Institute has been shaping finance careers since 1994, guiding students through CFA, FRM, CA and ACCA with concept-first teaching.

Explore Programs

  • CFA
  • FRM
  • CA
  • ACCA
  • Analyst Stack

Inside SSEI

  • About Us
  • Blogs
  • Beyond Academics
  • Free Resources

Get Guidance

Have a question or need help? We are here for you.

  • +91 75950 53300
  • info@ssei.co.in
  • 6A, Elgin Road, near Bhowanipore College, Kolkata, West Bengal 700020

Stay Updated

Get updates on courses, batches, offers, and exam resources.

SSEI

India's Leading Finance Prep Provider

Sanjay Saraf Educational Institute has been shaping finance careers since 1994, guiding students through CFA, FRM, CA and ACCA with concept-first teaching.

+91 75950 53300

Stay Updated

Get updates on courses, batches, offers, and exam resources.

SSEI is a CFA Institute Prep Provider, GARP Authorised Prep Provider for FRM, and an ACCA Approved Learning Partner. CFA Institute, GARP and ACCA do not endorse, promote, review or guarantee the products, services or study materials offered by SSEI. CFA, Chartered Financial Analyst, FRM and related marks are trademarks of their respective owners.

© 2026 Sanjay Saraf Educational Institute. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy·Terms and Conditions·Refund and Cancellation·Report a Bug

This matters because credit investors focus less on growth narratives and more on a company's ability to meet its obligations under weaker conditions. The concern does not mean the AI investment cycle is unsustainable - it does, however, raise a sharper question: will these investments generate returns high enough to justify their cost of capital?

That question becomes even more important when we move from infrastructure to the economics of the models themselves.

Closed Models vs. Open-Weight Models

The next question is whether the model layer itself can retain strong pricing power.

● Closed models: Such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, accessed through provider-controlled platforms or APIs. They offer convenience, scale and managed security, but usage costs can rise as adoption grows.

●  Open-weight models: Allow organisations to deploy and customise models within their own infrastructure or chosen cloud environment - giving greater control over data, compliance, security and operating costs.

The difference matters because capable open-weight models can reduce dependence on a small group of providers. As access becomes easier and models become more interchangeable, the model layer could gradually become commoditised — placing pressure on the pricing power and valuation premiums currently enjoyed by proprietary model providers.

The China Precedent

This commoditisation pressure is already visible. DeepSeek's emergence in January 2025, followed by other Chinese open-weight releases such as Moonshot's models, showed that competitive AI models may not require the same level of capital assumed by US hyperscalers.

Infrastructure still matters. But better model design, software optimisation and more efficient hardware use can reduce the capital required to achieve competitive performance. U.S. export controls on advanced AI chips have reinforced this approach by pushing Chinese developers to extract more value from the hardware already available - a reminder that AI progress depends not only on expanding compute, but on the efficiency with which existing hardware is used.

India is following a similar path through companies such as Sarvam AI, pursuing a more open, capital-light approach - partly out of necessity, and partly on a policy conviction that AI's benefits are best delivered through wider access rather than tight monetisation, echoing the logic India applied to its digital payments infrastructure.

There is a market read-through worth noting too: over the past month, Indian IT services stocks are reported to have risen roughly 15%, against a reported decline of 30%-40% in leading US AI-infrastructure companies. Directionally, that gap is consistent with a market starting to reprice which layer of the AI stack holds durable pricing power.

If capable models can be built at lower cost, the next question is clear: who helps enterprises deploy and integrate them securely at scale?

Where the Enterprise Integration Opportunity Sits

For enterprises, access to a capable model is only the beginning. The real challenge is deploying it securely, connecting it with existing systems, and making it work at production quality.

That is a systems-integration and enterprise-services problem, not a model-training problem - and it plays to the strengths of established IT services and enterprise software firms rather than to the hyperscalers themselves. Their value lies in combining models with data, workflows, governance and compliance. As model access becomes less differentiated, implementation may become the more valuable layer.

The corollary: a pricing headwind for hyperscalers on the model-serving side of their business, even as their infrastructure businesses continue to scale.

The Bottom Line

The long-term investment case for AI remains unchanged. Compute demand is growing, AI adoption continues to accelerate, and productivity gains are expected to unfold over many years.

But the returns may not accrue evenly across the stack. Hyperscalers will continue to benefit from rising demand for compute, yet if capable models become cheaper, more open and easier to deploy, durable pricing power may shift towards the companies that integrate AI into real business workflows.

The central investment question is therefore not whether AI will create value, but which layer of the stack will retain it.